India is positioning itself as a key advocate for the Global South, a collective of developing countries that have historically been marginalized in global governance and institutions. By bridging divides between the Global North and Global South, India plays a mediatory role on key issues like climate change, trade, and security. Through its active participation in forums like BRICS, the Quad, and the Voice of Global South Summit, India has emerged as a champion for the priorities of developing nations.
Bridging Divides in Global Forums:
India’s Role as a Mediator: India has positioned itself as a "Vishwa Bandhu" (friend of the world), advocating for the inclusion of developing nations in global governance structures. India helps to mediate between developed and developing nations on issues of climate change, trade, and security.
G20 Presidency (2023): During its G20 presidency, India made strides by securing the African Union’s inclusion as a permanent member, signaling a major shift towards Southern representation at the global level.
Advocating for Multilateral Reforms:
India has been a persistent advocate for reforms in global institutions, especially the UN Security Council (UNSC), the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These institutions continue to reflect post-World War II power structures, leaving developing nations underrepresented.
Leadership in Sustainability and Climate:
As the third-largest producer of solar and wind energy, India is leading the charge on sustainable development and climate justice for vulnerable nations. Initiatives like Mission LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment), the International Solar Alliance (ISA), and the National Green Hydrogen Mission underscore India’s commitment to climate action.
India is also advocating for climate finance to support the Global South in addressing climate change impacts despite their minimal contribution to global emissions.
Digital and Technological Innovation:
India is a global leader in Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI). Systems like Aadhaar and UPI have been adopted by several countries in the Global South, promoting digital equity and inclusion. India’s leadership in this area serves as an example for other developing nations, helping bridge the digital divide.
Humanitarian and Development Assistance:
India has increasingly become a first responder in global crises, providing humanitarian aid through operations like Operation Dost (Turkey), Operation Karuna (Myanmar), and Operation Kaveri (Sudan).
Additionally, Lines of Credit (LOCs) worth USD 12 billion have been extended to 42 African countries, showcasing India’s commitment to fostering development through financial assistance.
Strategic Autonomy and Balance:
India maintains a policy of strategic autonomy, engaging with both the West and the Global South without aligning rigidly with either bloc. Unlike China’s aggressive approach, India offers a non-threatening, consultative leadership model.
India’s Non-Alignment Movement (NAM), a product of the Cold War era, continues to be a guiding principle in its foreign policy, ensuring that developing countries can preserve their sovereignty and independence.
Despite growing influence, the Global South faces significant challenges in the current global order:
Lack of Representation in Global Institutions:
Major global institutions like the UNSC, IMF, and World Bank are still structured based on outdated power dynamics. India, despite being the world’s most populous country and an economic powerhouse, lacks permanent representation in the UN Security Council.
Unfair Global Trade Rules:
Developing countries continue to face unfair trade practices, such as high tariffs, protectionism, and the paralysis of the WTO dispute resolution system. This disproportionately affects smaller economies, which are heavily reliant on export-oriented growth.
Climate Injustice:
Developing nations bear the brunt of climate change but have historically contributed the least to its causes. Climate finance promised by the Global North remains insufficient and delayed, exacerbating the vulnerabilities of countries in the Global South.
Weaponisation of Interdependence:
Geopolitical tensions and disruptions in global supply chains have led to shortages in crucial resources like food, fertilizers, and energy, disproportionately affecting the Global South. Countries in South Asia and Africa, for example, have faced food crises due to disruptions from conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war.
Debt Crisis and Financial Vulnerability:
Countries in the Global South, such as Sri Lanka, continue to struggle with unsustainable external debt, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic and inflation. This has increased vulnerabilities and restricted their capacity to address pressing issues.
Inequitable Access to Technology:
Developing nations continue to face a digital divide, particularly in emerging technologies like AI, green tech, and semiconductors. This technological exclusion limits the ability of many in the Global South to innovate and compete globally.
Normative Double Standards:
The Global South often criticizes the West for selective human rights advocacy, acting on issues such as Ukraine while ignoring crises in regions like Gaza. Additionally, interference in the internal matters of developing nations is another point of contention.
South-South Cooperation (SSC) has become a vital tool for fostering solidarity among developing nations. India’s leadership in this domain exemplifies how cooperation within the Global South can complement traditional North-South aid models.
Bridging Development Gaps:
SSC provides flexible, context-specific solutions to development challenges that traditional North-South aid often fails to address. For instance, the India-UN Development Partnership Fund has provided demand-driven support to countries in Africa and the Pacific Islands.
Promoting SDGs through Local Solutions:
SSC focuses on context-specific solutions, aligning with the 2030 Agenda and offering tailored solutions to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, Colombia’s strategies to combat hunger and Brazilian agricultural technology have been successfully replicated in Africa.
Triangular Cooperation:
Triangular cooperation, where Southern nations lead initiatives with Northern backing, has become a practical middle ground. This collaborative approach combines the strengths of both the Global South and Global North.
Solidarity During Crises:
India’s vaccine diplomacy during the COVID-19 pandemic and other solidarity-driven actions underscore the potential of SSC to provide much-needed support to countries when North-South aid is insufficient or slow.
Geopolitical Realignment:
SSC is challenging the traditional power dynamics by promoting intra-South trade and fostering new alliances, particularly with emerging powers like India and Brazil. This realignment is shifting global economic gravity and contesting the centrality of the North.
Critiquing Conditionality:
Developing countries in the Global South often criticize the West’s use of conditionality in aid. SSC, on the other hand, presents a non-conditional alternative that respects sovereignty and ensures policy independence.
Redefining Development Leadership:
With emerging Southern powers like India leading initiatives such as the International Solar Alliance (ISA), the Global South is redefining what development leadership looks like, challenging the notion that solutions must come from the Global North.
India, through its leadership, can strengthen the collective voice of the Global South in various ways:
Building Collective Platforms:
India should institutionalize forums like the Voice of the Global South Summit as regular, high-level platforms to ensure a united voice in global governance.
Reforming Global Institutions:
India can continue to lead efforts to push for reforms in UNSC, IMF, and the World Bank, ensuring that developing nations are fairly represented in decision-making.
Mobilizing Development Finance:
India can advocate for the creation of a Global South Development Fund to finance infrastructure, digital transformation, and climate resilience projects across the South, with support from Japan and multilateral banks.
Driving South-South Trade and Connectivity:
India can reduce trade barriers, promote intra-South trade agreements, and expand initiatives like the Asia-Africa Growth Corridor (AAGC) to ensure more equitable trade flows.
Coordinated Peace and Security Role:
India can mobilize the Global South to take a greater role in UN peacekeeping, conflict mediation, and inclusive peacebuilding, showcasing the South’s contributions to global stability.
Balancing Global Partnerships:
India’s multi-alignment strategy allows the Global South to engage constructively with the Global North, ensuring that their concerns are not sidelined in Western-dominated forums.
The term Global South broadly refers to the regions of the world that are economically underdeveloped, low-income, and often politically or culturally marginalized. These regions are primarily located in Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and are often contrasted with the Global North, which includes economically advanced nations like those in Europe and North America.
The term Global South was first coined by American academic Carl Oglesby in 1969 to describe countries that were being dominated by the economic and political power of the Global North. The South, according to Oglesby, suffered from exploitation, often through colonialism, imperialism, and economic dependency.
The Brandt Line is a visual representation of the global economic divide between the wealthy North and the poorer South, based on measures like GDP per capita. It was proposed by Willy Brandt in the 1970s as part of his work on North-South relations. The line roughly divides the world at a latitude of 30° North and highlights the economic disparity between the countries above (the Global North) and those below (the Global South).
Latin America: Countries in Central and South America, like Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico.
Asia: Primarily South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh), Southeast Asia (Vietnam, Cambodia), and parts of East Asia (China, despite its rapid economic growth, is still often considered a leading power of the Global South).
Africa: Most African countries, including Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa.
Oceania: Including countries like Papua New Guinea and Fiji.
Economic Challenges:
Countries in the Global South often face economic inequality, poverty, underdeveloped infrastructure, and reliance on agriculture or natural resources. Many have limited access to capital, technology, or global markets.
Colonial History:
Many countries in the Global South were colonized by European powers and, after independence, struggled with issues like political instability, economic dependency, and social divisions.
Political and Social Marginalization:
Countries in the Global South often face political marginalization in global forums, such as the UN Security Council, where they are underrepresented. Their concerns—such as climate justice, trade imbalances, and debt—can be overlooked by wealthier, more powerful nations.
Development and Growth:
Some countries in the Global South, like India and China, have shown rapid economic growth, but overall, many remain in the low-income or lower-middle-income brackets by global standards. The Global South is working towards economic empowerment, technological advancement, and improved governance.
Environmental and Climate Issues:
Countries in the Global South often bear the brunt of climate change impacts despite contributing the least to global emissions. They face the greatest risks from natural disasters, rising sea levels, food insecurity, and water scarcity
India’s leadership in championing the Global South is not only a strategic move to enhance its geopolitical influence but also a demonstration of its commitment to creating a more inclusive and equitable global order. By fostering unity, providing credible leadership, and pushing for fair representation in global governance, India can help transform the Global South from a passive observer into an active shaper of the world’s future. Guided by the principles of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (“One Earth, One Family, One Future”), India is paving the way for a more balanced and inclusive global community
India's ongoing debate about simultaneous elections or the One Nation, One Election concept has gained momentum, with experts like Arvind Panagariya, Chairman of the 16th Finance Commission, emphasizing its potential to improve governance and policy implementation. The central idea is to hold elections for the Lok Sabha and all State Legislative Assemblies at the same time, thus streamlining the election process and reducing the disruptions caused by frequent electoral cycles.
Simultaneous elections refer to the process where the Lok Sabha elections (for the central government) and State Legislative Assembly elections are conducted together. This approach doesn't necessarily mean that all elections will take place on the same day, as elections can be held in phases but within a unified cycle.
In the past, Lok Sabha and State elections were conducted together, between 1952–1967. However, due to premature dissolutions of Parliament and State Assemblies, this synchronized cycle was disrupted, leading to staggered elections thereafter.
Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024:
Article 82A: Empowers the Election Commission of India (ECI) to conduct simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
Article 83: States that if the Lok Sabha is dissolved before completing its full term, the next Lok Sabha will only serve the unexpired portion of the term.
Article 172: Similar amendments are proposed for State Assemblies.
Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024:
Aligns the tenure of Union Territories’ Legislative Assemblies with the Lok Sabha to synchronize their electoral cycles.
Both bills have been referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee for detailed examination.
A committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind proposed a phased approach for implementing simultaneous elections:
Stage 1: Synchronize Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections.
Stage 2: Align municipal and panchayat elections within 100 days after the synchronization.
The committee also recommended a single electoral roll and a photo ID system for smooth election conduct.
Promotes Consistency in Governance:
Elections are often seen as distractions from policy-making. Holding elections simultaneously would shift the government's focus from campaigning to governance, ensuring that national and state development activities are prioritized.
It would reduce the financial burden of conducting multiple elections, freeing up resources for economic growth.
Prevents Policy Paralysis:
Multiple election cycles often disrupt policy implementation, as the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) inhibits government actions during election periods. Simultaneous elections would allow uninterrupted governance, enabling long-term policy continuity.
Resource Diversion:
Elections require significant resources—polling officials, security personnel, and civil servants. Simultaneous elections would reduce the repeated deployment of resources, allowing better allocation of manpower and resources for core government activities.
Political Opportunities:
By aligning elections, the system could offer opportunities for new leaders to emerge at all levels. It would also foster a more inclusive political system, potentially reducing the dominance of national parties in favor of regional representation.
Logistical Burden:
Managing 96 crore voters, 1 million polling booths, and over a million polling officials presents a massive logistical challenge. Ensuring security, updating electoral rolls, and running voter education campaigns simultaneously across all states would require significant coordination.
Technological Infrastructure:
For simultaneous elections, India would need an even larger number of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs). The existing infrastructure would need significant upgrading to handle such an extensive operation.
Federal Concerns:
Aligning the terms of State Assemblies with the Lok Sabha could dilute the federal spirit of the Constitution, as some states may feel their autonomy is compromised, especially if their terms are cut short or extended for synchronization.
Accountability:
Fewer election cycles could mean less frequent public scrutiny of the government’s performance, potentially weakening democratic accountability.
Regional Disparities:
Smaller states and regional parties might fear being sidelined during national elections, where issues of national importance and larger political parties could overshadow local concerns.
Constitutional Amendments:
Constitutional amendments to Articles 83, 85, 172, and 174 would be required, alongside changes to Article 356 to handle situations like the President’s Rule.
Simultaneous elections are not a novel idea in the global context. Several countries, such as South Africa and Sweden, have adopted synchronized election cycles, demonstrating both the challenges and benefits of such an approach.
In South Africa, national and provincial elections are held simultaneously every five years.
Municipal elections occur separately, but two years after the national and provincial elections.
This arrangement allows for cost-saving and greater political stability, ensuring that elections do not disrupt governance frequently.
In Sweden, elections for the National Legislature (Riksdag) and local bodies (Municipal Assemblies) are held on a fixed date.
This model ensures coordination and streamlined election management, which reduces the cost and time taken to conduct elections.
Both examples demonstrate how synchronization of elections at different levels can ensure political stability while reducing logistical challenges and costs.
The Law Commission of India in its 2018 report provided a comprehensive framework for restoring simultaneous elections in India, offering several key recommendations:
To enable simultaneous elections, certain amendments to the Indian Constitution and related legislation would be required. Specifically:
Articles 83, 85, 172, 174, and 356 need to be amended:
Article 83 (Duration of Lok Sabha and State Assemblies).
Article 85 (Sessions of Parliament and dissolution).
Article 172 (Duration of State Legislatures).
Article 174 (Sessions of State Legislatures).
Article 356 (President’s Rule) needs modification to address situations like premature dissolutions during synchronized election periods.
Amendments to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, would be required to synchronize the timing of elections for both the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
The rules of procedure in both the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies will need to be amended to accommodate changes related to no-confidence motions and the procedures for holding simultaneous elections.
Constructive Vote of No-confidence: The Law Commission recommended replacing the regular no-confidence motion with a constructive vote of no-confidence. This would avoid a hung assembly situation and ensure greater stability in governance.
The Anti-Defection Law may be diluted to prevent stalemates in case of a hung assembly or Parliament, which could hinder the formation of a stable government.
The six-month timeline for issuing the notification for general elections could be extended for a one-time measure to provide flexibility in organizing simultaneous elections.
Pilot projects in select states could help assess the feasibility of simultaneous elections and provide valuable data on logistical challenges, voter behavior, and cost implications.
These projects could test systems like electoral rolls, EVMs, and security arrangements on a smaller scale, making the transition smoother when extended to all states.
If the pilot projects succeed, the government could begin the process of amending the Constitution to allow simultaneous elections across the nation, aligning terms for both Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
Managing the increased cost of conducting simultaneous elections could require financial reforms:
Establish a separate election fund to streamline the allocation of resources.
Implement measures to promote transparency in political funding, ensuring that the electoral process remains fair and free from undue influence.
One of the major criticisms of frequent elections is the lack of focus on governance. If elections are held less frequently, political parties can dedicate more time to policy implementation rather than preparing for the next electoral cycle.
Strict rules should be set to ensure elected representatives prioritize governance during their term, instead of shifting their focus to campaigns.
The government should launch extensive public awareness campaigns to educate citizens on the benefits of simultaneous elections, including:
Reduced campaign expenditure.
Less disruption in governance.
Lower voter fatigue, ensuring higher voter turnout.
Achieving a political consensus among various parties is essential to ensure the successful implementation of simultaneous elections. This will require cross-party dialogues and mutual cooperation, as political interests may vary.
A consensus is especially important regarding issues like regional representation, duration of terms, and the timing of elections.
Staggered terms for state legislatures could be an effective solution to address regional variations. This would prevent all states from going to the polls at once, ensuring that the process remains manageable and efficient.
Such an arrangement could also prevent regional imbalances and provide a more balanced representation across the country
Legal Clarity:
Establish clear procedures and a definitive timeline for aligning elections, ensuring that the legal framework is robust enough to handle complex situations like premature dissolutions and by-elections.
Strengthen Electoral Infrastructure:
Create a unified electoral roll that is shared across all levels of elections, improving voter verification, result management, and logistical coordination.
Public Awareness Campaigns:
Conduct nationwide awareness drives to educate the public on the benefits of simultaneous elections, countering concerns and building support for the process.
Capacity Building:
Train election officials and improve their technological and administrative capabilities to handle simultaneous elections efficiently.
Adjust Election Timings:
Shift state elections in a way that aligns with the Lok Sabha electoral cycle, ensuring synchronization without causing disruptions.
The concept of simultaneous elections could represent a transformative shift in India’s electoral and governance framework. By aligning elections at multiple levels, the country could reduce the administrative burden, enhance governance efficiency, and promote long-term policy continuity. However, its successful implementation requires political consensus, constitutional amendments, and significant logistical preparedness.
India recently hosted the 8th Annual Contractors' Meeting of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) at the CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography in Goa. This significant event brought together global experts to discuss the latest developments in deep-sea exploration, with a focus on sustainable resource management and India’s leadership role in ocean exploration.
The meeting highlighted India’s pioneering contributions to international seabed exploration and its dedication to a vision of shared oceanic resources under the “common heritage of mankind” principle.
India’s Role in Deep-Sea Exploration:
India’s involvement in seabed exploration dates back to its pioneering role as the first country to receive an area for polymetallic nodule (PMN) exploration in international waters. This achievement positioned India as a “Pioneer Investor”, underscoring its leadership in sustainable ocean exploration.
India’s Exploration Areas:
India currently holds the largest exploration area for Polymetallic Sulphides (PMS) in the international seabed. With two PMS exploration contracts, India is actively engaged in seabed resource exploration in the Central Indian Ridge, Southwest Indian Ridge, and Carlsberg Ridge of the Indian Ocean. This represents a substantial contribution to global ocean resource management.
Sustainable Resource Management:
The meeting emphasized the need for responsible and sustainable management of deep-sea resources, aligning with India’s Deep Ocean Mission and global efforts to ensure that seabed mineral extraction benefits all of humanity. This includes adhering to the principles outlined under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), focusing on equitable and sustainable resource use.
Collaboration and Global Partnerships:
India’s leadership in the international seabed exploration is not just national but global. The country’s engagement with the International Seabed Authority (ISA)—an autonomous body established under UNCLOS—further cements its role in shaping international laws for the governance and regulation of seabed mining activities for the common benefit of all nations.
Headquarters: Kingston, Jamaica
Mandate: Established under the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the 1994 Implementation Agreement, the ISA regulates mineral resource activities on the international seabed to ensure that these resources are used for the benefit of humanity, particularly to assist developing countries and protect the marine environment.
Membership: The ISA has 170 member states, including India, all of whom have a vested interest in ensuring the sustainable use and equitable distribution of seabed resources.
The ISA plays a crucial role in balancing economic development with environmental protection, ensuring that the vast and resource-rich international seabed is explored responsibly and shared equitably among the nations of the world.
India’s Deep Ocean Mission is a flagship initiative aimed at exploring and sustainably managing the resources of the deep ocean.
Polymetallic Nodules (PMN): Extracting critical minerals for technology and energy needs, including cobalt, nickel, and rare earth metals.
Marine Biotechnology: Investigating the deep sea for biological resources that may offer solutions in medicine, agriculture, and other sectors.
Environmental Protection: Safeguarding marine ecosystems and preventing damage to marine biodiversity during resource extraction.
Technology Development: Advancing submarine robotics, underwater sensors, and sustainable mining technologies for the future of deep-sea exploration.
Recently, a Supreme Court judge raised concerns about the increasing misuse of defamation laws by political figures and private individuals to settle personal and political disputes. The judge suggested the need to decriminalise defamation in order to prevent its misuse and safeguard freedom of speech.
Defamation is the act of making false statements about someone that damage their reputation. These statements can be made through spoken words (slander) or written/published content (libel). The harm can extend not just to individuals, but also to companies, associations, and even deceased persons (where the impact is measured on the family or close relatives).
Libel: Defamatory statements made in a permanent form (e.g., writing, images, published works).
Slander: Defamation through spoken words or temporary expressions.
Defamation cases are subjectively interpreted by courts, meaning the context and evidence are key factors in determining whether defamation occurred.
In India, defamation is defined and regulated under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), specifically Sections 499 & 500, which have now been incorporated into the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Criminal Defamation: This is punishable by imprisonment or fine and requires strong proof.
Civil Defamation: Involves a suit for damages, with no criminal penalty but compensation for harm to reputation.
Criminal defamation is seen as a strong deterrent that protects public interest, especially for vulnerable individuals who may face discrimination or hate speech.
A key judgment in this regard is the Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India (2016) case. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of criminal defamation, arguing that protecting an individual’s reputation is an essential part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Court also ruled that criminal defamation is a “reasonable restriction” on freedom of speech under Article 19(2), which permits such restrictions in the interest of public order, decency, and morality.
There is a growing call to decriminalise defamation, driven by concerns over its misuse.
Preventing Misuse:
Criminal defamation laws are often used as a tool by politicians or private individuals to settle scores or target critics, especially in politically charged environments.
Protecting Freedom of Speech:
The criminalisation of defamation creates a chilling effect on free speech, especially for journalists, activists, and citizens. Decriminalisation would provide a safer environment for expressing opinions, free from the fear of imprisonment for defamation.
Civil Remedies are Sufficient:
Defamation can still be addressed through civil defamation suits, which are less punitive and allow for compensation without the threat of imprisonment. Many democracies, such as the United States, treat defamation as a civil matter rather than a criminal offense.
Proportionality:
Reputational harm is primarily a civil injury, and criminal punishment (especially imprisonment) may be seen as disproportionate for harm to reputation.
Judicial Economy:
Criminal defamation cases contribute to the backlog of cases in Indian courts, whereas civil defamation suits are typically more efficient and less burdensome.
Decriminalise Private Defamation:
Shift private defamation cases to civil law and restrict criminal defamation only to public interest matters or cases related to national security.
Strengthen Civil Remedies:
Fast-track courts for defamation cases.
Establish clear norms for compensation.
Provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to ensure quicker justice.
Clear Standards for Defamation:
Revisit judicial rulings (e.g., the 2016 judgment) to provide clearer guidelines distinguishing fair criticism, satire, irony, and malicious defamation.
Safeguard Press Freedom:
Introduce protections for journalists, whistleblowers, and others who act in the public interest, ensuring they are not silenced through defamation suits.
Prevent SLAPP Suits:
Enact laws to counter SLAPP suits (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), which are used to harass and silence critics, especially by powerful individuals or corporations.
Public Awareness and Media Literacy:
Educate the public about responsible speech and the remedies available, emphasizing the importance of using civil suits for defamation.
Defamation remains a complex issue, where the right to free speech often comes into conflict with the protection of reputation. Reforming defamation laws in India must strike a delicate balance between ensuring that individuals can defend their reputations and preserving the freedom of expression. Any changes to these laws must be carefully considered to avoid silencing legitimate criticism while ensuring adequate protections for dignity and reputation
The Online National Drugs Licensing System (ONDLS) is a significant digital initiative aimed at streamlining the licensing process for drugs and pharmaceutical products in India. Recently, it's been reported that although 18 state drug control authorities have adopted the platform, no state has yet fully complied with the Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) guidelines for the portal, according to a source in the Union Health Ministry.
The ONDLS is a single-window digital platform designed for the processing of various drug-related licenses across India. It provides a centralized, transparent, and efficient system for handling applications related to the issuance of licenses and certificates for drug manufacturing, sales, and related activities.
Uniform Licensing Process:
The system ensures a uniform approach to licensing across the country, which means that drug regulatory requirements and the process of obtaining licenses are standardized across all states and Union Territories.
Types of Licenses Processed:
It handles the issuance of a variety of licenses and certificates, including:
Manufacturing and sales licenses
Blood Bank licenses
Certificates such as COPP (Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product), GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices), WHO-GMP, and Market Standing Certificate
Post-approval changes to licenses
Integration with Regulatory Authorities:
The ONDLS platform is developed by the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (CDAC) in collaboration with the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), the Directorate General of Health Services, and State/UT Drugs Regulatory Authorities.
Transparency and Accountability:
The digital platform ensures that the drug licensing process is transparent, trackable, and accountable, thus reducing corruption and administrative delays.
Ease of Access:
The portal is designed to make the licensing process accessible online, eliminating the need for physical visits to drug control offices, which simplifies the procedure for applicants.
Efficiency:
ONDLS enhances the efficiency of licensing, as it streamlines the entire process, from application submission to approval, and reduces human error and processing time.
Document Standardization:
The system aims to standardize the types of documents required for different types of applications across the country, ensuring uniformity in the licensing process.
Support for Drug-Related Regulations:
It helps to ensure that drug-related establishments such as manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies comply with national standards for safety and efficacy.
Non-Compliance with CAPA Guidelines:
A key challenge is that although many states have adopted the ONDLS platform, none have fully complied with the Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) guidelines. This implies that certain corrective measures to optimize the system or prevent errors are still pending in most regions.
Need for Full Implementation:
For the system to be effective nationwide, full compliance with the CAPA guidelines and broader adoption across all states and UTs is crucial.
The ONDLS portal is a pioneering initiative aimed at transforming the drug licensing system in India, making it more transparent, efficient, and standardized. However, its success hinges on full compliance with guidelines across all states and Union Territories, and the implementation of corrective actions to address any discrepancies. Once these challenges are addressed, the ONDLS has the potential to significantly improve the regulatory landscape for pharmaceuticals in India
Recent research has unveiled that the famous moai statues of Easter Island were not dragged or rolled into position as previously believed. Instead, the island's early inhabitants employed a remarkable method of "walking" these giant stone figures upright, utilizing sophisticated engineering techniques.
Location:
Easter Island, known as Rapa Nui to its original Polynesian inhabitants, is located in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. It is one of the most isolated inhabited islands in the world.
Distance:
About 3,540 km west of Chile.
Around 1,900 km east of Pitcairn Island.
Geography:
Area: Covers 163.6 sq.km.
Shape: Triangular in shape, with a length of 24 km and a maximum width of 12 km.
The island is volcanic in origin and comprises three extinct volcanoes: Terevaka, Poike, and Rano Kau.
Climate:
Easter Island has a tropical rainforest climate, which has influenced both its ecology and the culture of its inhabitants.
UNESCO World Heritage Status:
Easter Island was declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO on March 22, 1996, recognizing its unique archaeological and cultural significance.
The moai statues are megalithic sculptures that are iconic to Easter Island (Rapa Nui), located in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. These statues, carved in volcanic rock, are a testament to the ingenuity and cultural significance of the island’s ancient people.
Human-Like Figures:
The moai statues are shaped to resemble large human heads, with the faces being the most prominent feature. They are characterized by their elongated faces, broad foreheads, and long noses.
Pukao:
A distinctive feature of many moai is the Pukao, a hat-like covering placed on the heads. These coverings are made from scoria, a soft red volcanic stone, and are often referred to as "topknots." They are thought to represent the hairstyles of important ancestors or individuals.
Size:
Moai vary in size, with some reaching up to 40 feet (12 meters) in height and weighing as much as 75 tonnes. These massive statues stand on stone pedestals called ahu.
Carved from Volcanic Rock:
The moai were carved from volcanic tuff (a porous rock formed from compressed volcanic ash) at quarries located on the island. The largest of the moai, found at the Rano Raraku quarry, were sculpted and then moved to their ceremonial locations across the island.
Transport and Erection:
Recent studies have shown that the statues were not dragged but instead "walked" upright to their locations using a complex method involving ropes and coordinated movement. This method, known as the “walking” technique, was an incredible feat of engineering.
Honor and Ancestry:
The primary purpose of the moai statues was to honor important individuals, particularly chieftains or high-ranking figures who had passed away. The statues were crafted to resemble the deceased and were placed on ahu, which were also used as tombs for the ancestors they represented.
Representation of Ancestors:
The Rapa Nui people believed that the moai carried the spiritual power (mana) of the individuals they represented, and thus, the statues were placed strategically to oversee and protect the living communities.
Distinct Features:
Each moai was designed with distinct characteristics that reflected the physical features of the person it was meant to represent. The designs of the faces were intentionally varied, reflecting the diversity among the ancestors.
The Tomahawk missile has recently been a focal point in global geopolitics, with Russian President Vladimir Putin warning that the potential approval of its delivery to Ukraine by US President Donald Trump could severely damage relations between Washington and Moscow.
The Tomahawk missile is an American-made long-range cruise missile primarily used for deep land attack warfare. It is known for its precision and stealth capabilities, and has been a vital part of the U.S. military's arsenal since the 1990s.
Size and Weight:
Length: 18.3 feet
Weight: 3,200 pounds (approximately 4,400 pounds with booster)
Warhead:
It carries a 1,000-pound conventional warhead or cluster munitions.
Launch Mechanism:
Launched from ships or submarines using a Vertical Launch System.
Power Source:
During launch, it is powered by a solid propellant.
After launch, it switches to a turbofan engine that operates with minimal heat emission, making it difficult to detect using infrared.
Flight Path:
The Tomahawk missile flies at low altitudes, which helps it avoid detection and interference by enemy radar. It is used to strike fixed targets like communication and air-defense sites, particularly in areas where manned aircraft are vulnerable.
Guidance System:
The missile is guided by a combination of GPS, inertial navigation, and terrain contour mapping, which makes it highly accurate with a margin of error of only about 10 meters.
Range and Speed:
Maximum Range: 2,400 kilometers
Maximum Speed: 885 km/h
Cost:
Each Tomahawk missile costs around $2 million.
The Tomahawk missile was first deployed in combat during Operation Desert Storm in 1991. It has since been used in multiple military conflicts, including Syria in 2017. Its precision strikes have made it a crucial asset in modern warfare, especially in regions where traditional military aircraft might be at risk.
Ukraine Conflict:
The potential delivery of Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine has sparked tensions, particularly with Russia, due to the missile’s long-range capabilities and ability to target key infrastructure. Moscow perceives this move as a major escalation in the ongoing conflict.
U.S.-Russia Relations:
Putin's comments indicate that the decision to supply such weapons to Ukraine could further strain already tense relations between Russia and the United States. This situation highlights the growing involvement of advanced weaponry in modern warfare and the geopolitical ramifications of such arms transfers.
The Tomahawk missile represents a critical component of the U.S. military's strategic arsenal, offering significant capabilities in precision strikes and long-range attacks. Its potential use in Ukraine has raised alarm in Russia, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing conflict and global security concerns
The Black Sea remains a focal point of global geopolitical and environmental significance. Recently, Russia reported the destruction of 251 Ukrainian drones overnight, mostly over its southwest and in the Black Sea region, with one of the drones even targeting Moscow.
Location and Size:
The Black Sea is a large inland sea located at the southeastern extremity of Europe, covering an area of about 436,000 square kilometers. It is one of the marginal seas of the Atlantic Ocean and is bordered by six countries:
Turkey (south)
Bulgaria and Romania (west)
Ukraine (north)
Russia (northeast)
Georgia (east)
Strategic Importance:
The Black Sea has long been a crucial maritime passage for trade, particularly for Russia and Ukraine, especially in terms of grain exports and energy shipments. The sea connects to the Aegean Sea (and thus the Mediterranean) through the Bosporus Strait, and to the Sea of Azov via the Kerch Strait.
Environmental Features:
Meromictic Basin: The Black Sea is the world’s largest meromictic basin, meaning that the water movement between the surface and the lower layers is rare. The lower layers of the sea are anoxic (lack oxygen), which is important for understanding its marine biodiversity and chemistry.
Low Salinity: It has lower salinity than the world’s oceans due to limited saltwater exchanges with the Mediterranean.
Key Rivers: Major rivers flowing into the Black Sea include the Danube, Dnieper, Southern Bug, Rioni, and Dniester.
Militarization:
The Black Sea is home to strategic military bases, such as Russia’s Black Sea Fleet stationed in Sevastopol, Crimea. This region is heavily militarized, with NATO and Russia frequently conducting naval operations, further exacerbating tensions.
Key Islands:
Snake Island (Ukraine)
Giresun Island (Turkey)
St. Ivan Island (Bulgaria)
Geopolitical: The Black Sea remains a critical point of conflict due to the territorial and maritime disputes, particularly between Russia and Ukraine. The Black Sea’s role in global energy security, particularly for Russia’s gas and oil exports, has made it a major geopolitical hotspot.
Environmental: The anoxic zones in the Black Sea have contributed to challenges in maintaining marine biodiversity, with the lower layers lacking oxygen and affecting the quality of marine life.
The ongoing drone attacks by Ukraine and the broader military tensions underscore the Black Sea’s critical importance in the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The region's security remains volatile, impacting not only the involved countries but also global trade, particularly through the Black Sea's maritime lanes.
The Black Sea's combination of strategic military importance and environmental challenges makes it a key area for both regional and global security concerns, especially given the ongoing war in Ukraine and its repercussions on world trade
The Mig La Pass, located on the Changthang Plateau in Ladakh, has recently set a world record with the construction of the world's highest motorable road at 19,400 feet above sea level. It is taller than both the South Base Camp of Mount Everest in Nepal (17,598 feet) and the North Base Camp in Tibe (16,900 feet).This significant achievement was carried out by Project Himank under the Border Roads Organisation (BRO), a critical initiative for improving road connectivity in the strategically important region of Ladakh.
World Record: At 19,400 feet, Mig La Pass now holds the title of the highest motorable road in the world.
Strategic Importance: The road connects Likaru–Mig La–Fukche, forming a crucial corridor from Hanle to Fukche, which is near the Indo-China border. This enhances connectivity and facilitates faster movement of personnel and materials in the region.
All-Weather Road: The road is designed to be all-season, built to withstand harsh winters, shifting glaciers, and the thin oxygen levels in the high-altitude environment. It is the highest all-weather road globally, making it a significant engineering marvel.
Foundation: Project Himank was established on December 4, 1985, with the aim of improving road communication in the Ladakh region. The project was crucial due to the high-altitude terrain, limited working season, and challenging environmental conditions.
Strategic Role: Project Himank has been instrumental in ensuring the maintenance of communication and access to strategic areas close to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China. It also played a pivotal role during military operations such as Op VIJAY.
Ongoing Contributions: The project continues to assist in restoring road communication, including clearing landslides, avalanches, and snow, as well as building bridges and opening airfields. These operations have ensured that key routes like the Leh-Manali and Zojila axes remain operational despite the region's tough conditions.
The construction of the Mig La Pass and its associated infrastructure under Project Himank is a monumental achievement in terms of both engineering and strategic value.
It not only enhances military access but also provides greater connectivity to remote regions of Ladakh, benefiting both civilians and the armed forces.
We provide offline, online and recorded lectures in the same amount.
Every aspirant is unique and the mentoring is customised according to the strengths and weaknesses of the aspirant.
In every Lecture. Director Sir will provide conceptual understanding with around 800 Mindmaps.
We provide you the best and Comprehensive content which comes directly or indirectly in UPSC Exam.
If you haven’t created your account yet, please Login HERE !
We provide offline, online and recorded lectures in the same amount.
Every aspirant is unique and the mentoring is customised according to the strengths and weaknesses of the aspirant.
In every Lecture. Director Sir will provide conceptual understanding with around 800 Mindmaps.
We provide you the best and Comprehensive content which comes directly or indirectly in UPSC Exam.
Offline/Online Class
