Daily News Analysis

Right to Property

stylish_lining

Right to Property

The Supreme Court's recent judgment reaffirms the importance of the Right to Property as a Constitutional right under Article 300A and a human right in a welfare state. The decision has significant implications for governance, fairness in land acquisition, and timely compensation for property owners.

Key Takeaways from the Judgment

  1. Recognition of Article 300A:

    • The Right to Property is not a Fundamental Right but remains protected as a Constitutional Right.

    • It ensures that individuals cannot be deprived of their property except through legal authority and processes.

  2. Adequate Compensation:

    • The Court mandated that fair market value of the land must be considered during compensation, particularly accounting for delays.

    • Compensation delays caused by state authorities diminish the real value due to inflation and lost financial opportunities.

  3. Case Specifics:

    • The judgment arose from the Bengaluru-Mysuru Infrastructure Corridor Project (BMICP) case.

    • Landowners were deprived of compensation since 2005, prompting the Court to direct the market value to be determined as of April 2019, ensuring justice to landowners.

  4. Judicial Intervention:

    • The Supreme Court exercised its Article 142 powers to provide equitable relief.

    • The ruling aimed to rectify delays attributed to state authorities' inefficiency and uphold the principle of just compensation.

  5. Implications of Timely Compensation:

    • Delay in compensation undermines its value and erodes public trust in government processes.

    • The Court emphasized accountability for authorities and adherence to constitutional principles in governance.

Historical Context of Right to Property

  1. Pre-1978:

    • Initially a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31.

    • Land reform laws led to frequent conflicts, requiring several amendments.

  2. Post-1978:

    • The 44th Constitutional Amendment removed the Right to Property from the list of Fundamental Rights.

    • It was redefined under Article 300A as a Constitutional Right, ensuring property can only be acquired through legal authority.

Implications of the Judgment

  1. For Governance:

    • Enhances accountability of state authorities to ensure timely and fair compensation in land acquisitions.

    • Establishes legal precedent for addressing bureaucratic inefficiencies in land-related matters.

  2. For Property Owners:

    • Provides protection against arbitrary deprivation of property.

    • Reinforces the principle of just compensation aligned with inflation and market value.

  3. Economic and Social Justice:

    • Highlights the economic realities of delayed compensation and inflation's impact on property owners.

    • Reflects the judiciary's role in protecting citizens' rights in welfare governance.

Way Forward

  • Strengthening Legal Frameworks: Ensure prompt procedures and better oversight in land acquisition cases.

  • Efficient Disbursal Mechanisms: Establish timelines for determining and paying compensation.

  • Judicial Vigilance: Maintain the judiciary's proactive role in addressing state inefficiencies and upholding constitutional principles.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting constitutional rights and ensuring fairness in state actions concerning property. It underscores the judiciary's role as a guardian of individual rights in a welfare-oriented legal framework.


 

India’s Import Curbs on Jute Products from Bangladesh

India has imposed immediate restrictions on the import of jute and allied fibre products from Bangladesh. These apply at all Indian land and seaports except Nhava Sheva in Maharash
Share It

GPS Interference

  GPS interference refers to deliberate or unintentional disruption of Global Positioning System (GPS) signals, which are crucial for navigation in aircraft, ships, and ground transport sy
Share It

India’s Civil Nuclear Law Reform:

  India is revising its civil nuclear laws—the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA), 2010—to: Attract private and forei
Share It

Secondary Pollutants

A recent study has shed light on an important aspect of India's air pollution crisis: secondary pollutants, which now contribute to nearly one-third of PM2.5 pollution in the country. These pollut
Share It

Myogenesis

Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla’s Myogenesis experiments on the ISS represent a major leap forward in India’s space research efforts, focusing on the formation and regulation of muscle fib
Share It

Central Sector Scheme of Scholarship for College and University Students (CSSS)

A scholarship scheme under the Pradhan Mantri Uchchatar Shiksha Protsahan (PM-USP) initiative by the Ministry of Education’s Department of Higher Education. It Provides financial assistance to m
Share It

Khasi People

The Meghalaya High Court has admitted a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the tribal certificate issuance for the Khasi community.This PIL challenges a government decision that has halted th
Share It

Similipal Tiger Reserve

Odisha High Court issued a notice to the Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA) over a ban on Munda tribals from accessing Jayara, a sacred grove inside the tiger reserve.This raised concerns ove
Share It

Begonia nyishiorum

A fascinating new species of flowering plant, Begonia nyishiorum, has been discovered in the East Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh, further highlighting the rich but underexplored biodiversity of
Share It

Asiatic Wild Dog

Asiatic Wild Dog A new study by the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) has confirmed the return of the dhole (Asiatic wild dog) to Kaziranga-Karbi Anglong Landscape (KKAL) in Assam, after being beli
Share It

Newsletter Subscription


ACQ IAS
ACQ IAS