Daily News Analysis

The triumph of Vachathi over a hostile state

stylish_lining

The triumph of Vachathi over a hostile state

 

 

Why in the News?

The Madras High Court’s judgment recently upheld the human rights of the people of Vachathi in Tamil Nadu by recognising that coordinated and large-scale repression by uniformed forces cannot take place without orders from the top levels of the government.

What was the issue?

  1. Vachathi is a remote village of Adivasis in Dharmapuri district of Tamil Nadu.
  2. On June 20, 1992, nearly 300 uniformed officials set violence on the village on the pretext of unearthing smuggled sandalwood. 
  3. During the violence, 18 women including a woman who was pregnant were raped and 90 women, 28 children and 15 men were illegally confined in the Forest Ranger’s office. 
  4. The custodians of law ordered the “Oor Gounder” (the village chief) to strip the women. 
  5. Due to continued plunder and violence by the officials, villagers were forced to flee to the forests.
  6. The government machinery down to the District Collector, the Revenue Divisional Officer, the Superintendent of Police and the Chief Conservator of Forests failed to take action despite representations.

The High Court intervention:

  1. The Madras HC ordered for an investigation by Central Bureau of Investigation, after a public interest litigation was filed in the court.
  2. This became the rarest case in the legal history where all 215 accused (the survivors of the 269 accused), government and law enforcement personnel stand convicted en masse of offences.
  3. All of the accused were booked under The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Indian Penal Code. 
  4. Punishments involving rigorous imprisonment ranging from one to 10 years with fine has also been imposed.
  5. The HC fixed the responsibility on the state to pay the enhanced compensation of ₹10 lakh and to ensure a job for each rape survivor. 

Gross lacunae in the criminal justice system:

  1. No special procedures, evidentiary principles and criminal liability have been prescribed in law for organised crimes by state actors.
  2. There is a need for the prosecutor to prove the guilt of each of those accused as if an individual offence had been committed.
  3. Principle 24 of the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials states that:
  • Law enforcement agencies must adopt measures to ensure that superior officers are held responsible if they have not taken actions to prevent/report their subordinates who have restored to violation of human rights.
  • Such shift of onus on top level officials are not present in our criminal system
  1. Inter-American Court of Human Rights in South America: judgments
    1. Being ignorant of actual occurrence of incidence cannot be claimed to be not guilty.
    2. The responsibility of superiors lies in exercising adequate supervision and control that includes
      1. Knowledge of risk by state officials.
      2. The duty to know of the existence of a real and immediate risk to life and/or physical integrity.
      3. The reasonable possibilities of preventing or avoiding that risk.
  2. Article 28 of the Rome Statute: followed by International Court of Justice
    1. Follows the principle of command responsibility
  3. The new criminal laws proposed recently to decolonise old laws do not recognise organised violence by state agents as a separate class of crime, and state violence as a colonial legal was failed to be acknowledged.

The Great Nicobar Project

The Great Nicobar Project is a massive infrastructure overhaul that has emerged as a focal point for India’s strategic and developmental ambitions. Piloted by NITI Aayog, the project is valu
Share It

Global and National Developments on Gender Recognition

Global Context: United States: The Trump administration recognized only two genders—male and female—excluding transgender individuals. This approach raised questions about the
Share It

Voting Rights for Internal Migrants in India

Universal Adult Suffrage (Article 326 of the Indian Constitution) ensures that every citizen aged 18 and above has the right to vote in Lok Sabha (Parliament) and State Legislative Assembly
Share It

Urban Governance

As India’s urban population continues to grow rapidly, achieving gender equity in urban governance is essential for building inclusive, sustainable, and resilient cities. The exclusion of wo
Share It

Maternity rights

The recent Supreme Court judgment in the case of K. Uma Devi vs State of Tamil Nadu marks a landmark shift in recognizing maternity rights as a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Indian Con
Share It

India's Criminal Justice System

The recent acquittal of the 12 men convicted in the Mumbai Train Blast Case (2006) by the Bombay High Court has reignited debate over the effectiveness and integrity of India's criminal justic
Share It

India's Aviation Safety

The preliminary report of the Air India Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) remains inconclusive, raising troubling questions about the pilot's i
Share It

Antimicrobial Resistance

India’s steps to regulate the use of antibiotics in food animal production reflect a growing global consensus on the need to address Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). The potential consequence
Share It

solar energy potential

India’s push toward leveraging its vast solar energy potential represents a critical strategy for accelerating the transition to net-zero emissions by 2070, as part of its long-term climate
Share It

submarine cables

The issue of securing submarine cables is increasingly being recognized as a sovereign imperative in today's data-driven world. Subsea cables are crucial infrastructure for global communicatio
Share It

Newsletter Subscription


ACQ IAS
ACQ IAS