The preliminary report of the Air India Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) remains inconclusive, raising troubling questions about the pilot's intent and potential systemic failures. The lack of clarity underscores structural flaws in India's aviation ecosystem, where multiple agencies and actors intersect but often fail to collaborate efficiently to ensure safety. While India’s aviation sector has made impressive strides, critical gaps remain in regulation, maintenance, and safety protocols, all of which must be urgently addressed to prevent future disasters.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is India’s official agency, tasked with investigating aviation accidents and serious incidents:
Established in 2012, AAIB operates under the Ministry of Civil Aviation and follows ICAO Annex 13 protocols, which ensure independent and transparent investigations.
The Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017 empower AAIB to access evidence freely and conduct investigations without judicial approval.
Despite these frameworks, the Ahmedabad Boeing 787 crash investigation has highlighted limitations in fully unraveling the underlying issues, particularly in areas like pilot intent and systemic failures across agencies involved in aviation oversight.
India’s aviation sector is a critical component of its economic growth, and its ecosystem is vast, involving numerous actors:
Airlines manage aircraft and crew.
Airports Authority of India (AAI) oversees airport infrastructure and air traffic control.
Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) regulates airworthiness, safety, and compliance.
The Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) supervises the overarching framework.
The Swiss Cheese Model of safety explains aviation accidents as a result of multiple, overlapping failures. A single failure in any of these areas may not be disastrous by itself, but when failures align, a disaster can unfold. The recent incidents, including the Boeing 787 crash, highlight systemic vulnerabilities at multiple levels.
India's aviation sector is growing rapidly, with over 174 million passengers in 2025 and a fleet of 860+ aircraft. The sector is expected to reach 500 million passengers by 2030, cementing its place as the third-largest aviation market globally. However, despite these achievements, significant safety concerns remain.
India has outperformed major global players like the US and China in key safety parameters:
Operations: 94.02% compliance.
Airworthiness: 97.06%.
Effective Implementation: 85.65%.
India retains Category 1 Status from the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), allowing its airlines to operate freely in the US. However, accidents and incidents have shown that the rapid expansion of the aviation sector has not been met with parallel safety reforms.
Several critical systemic failures are contributing to the vulnerabilities within the Indian aviation system:
The DGCA often relies on foreign regulators like FAA and EASA for certification and airworthiness checks, which has exposed the system during crises, such as the IndiGo-Pratt & Whitney engine failures (2017–18).
The maintenance ecosystem faces issues with underqualified technicians, lack of duty-time limits for aircraft maintenance engineers (AMEs), and cost-cutting measures that lead to substandard aircraft maintenance.
Fatigue rules are often violated, leading to potential errors in judgment during critical phases of flight.
Pilots face limited mobility, allowing airlines to exert coercive pressure on their workforce to meet schedules, sometimes compromising safety.
Severe staff shortages within the ATC system affect operations, as licensed Air Traffic Controller Officers (ATCOs) are in short supply.
The ATC licensing system remains largely non-functional, and duty-time limits for ATCOs, established in 2010, continue to be ignored.
Individuals within airlines and the Airports Authority of India (AAI) who report safety violations often face retaliation, such as transfers, demotions, or termination, discouraging internal safety audits and reporting.
The Indian judiciary has occasionally stepped in to prevent aviation tragedies. Public interest litigations (PILs) have been instrumental in exposing regulatory failures, with notable cases:
Ghatkopar (2018) Crash: A Bombay High Court stay in 2016 halted unsafe construction near Mumbai airport, preventing a potentially fatal crash.
Mumbai Airspace Violations: Over 5,000 obstructions near Mumbai airport still persist, with regulatory bodies failing to inform the courts accurately.
The judiciary's oversight has often been crucial in highlighting lapses in the regulatory framework, but judicial intervention should not be a remedy—it should be a preventative measure.
To strengthen the aviation ecosystem and address these vulnerabilities, several reforms are essential:
Autonomy for DGCA: Grant DGCA independence from MoCA to eliminate conflicts of interest and enhance regulatory rigor.
International Benchmarking: Align safety protocols with ICAO standards and regularly conduct third-party audits of Indian aviation systems.
Real-Time Data Sharing: Create a centralized safety database accessible to all stakeholders, including whistleblower reports and real-time flight risk assessments.
Confidential Reporting Channels: Establish non-punitive systems for pilots and crew to report psychological concerns or safety violations.
Mandatory Counseling Access: Ensure pilots undergo regular mental health screenings and have access to optional therapy, funded by airlines.
Strict Enforcement of Work Hours: Enforce duty-time limits strictly to mitigate fatigue-related errors.
Air Traffic Control (ATC) Reform: Modernize radar infrastructure, hire more controllers, and update training programs.
Maintenance Accountability: Impose stricter penalties for substandard maintenance and ensure only qualified personnel conduct maintenance checks.
Obstacle Mapping & Clearance: Conduct satellite audits of high-rise structures near airports to identify safety hazards and retrofit or demolish buildings as needed.
Safety Zones for New Airports: Avoid shortcuts like displaced thresholds without proper safety justification.
Whistleblower Protection: Establish a legal framework to protect insiders who report violations from retaliation.
Public Access to Incident Reports: Publish investigation findings and DGCA audits to ensure transparency and accountability.
Special Aviation Tribunals: Establish fast-track courts for aviation-related cases to expedite resolution.
The Indian aviation sector is at a critical juncture. While it continues to grow rapidly, institutional decay, regulatory lapses, and systemic failures remain significant challenges. The recent crash and ongoing investigations are a reminder that without comprehensive safety reforms, accountable regulation, and a culture of transparency, aviation disasters may not just be rare events, but a matter of when, not if.
We provide offline, online and recorded lectures in the same amount.
Every aspirant is unique and the mentoring is customised according to the strengths and weaknesses of the aspirant.
In every Lecture. Director Sir will provide conceptual understanding with around 800 Mindmaps.
We provide you the best and Comprehensive content which comes directly or indirectly in UPSC Exam.
If you haven’t created your account yet, please Login HERE !
We provide offline, online and recorded lectures in the same amount.
Every aspirant is unique and the mentoring is customised according to the strengths and weaknesses of the aspirant.
In every Lecture. Director Sir will provide conceptual understanding with around 800 Mindmaps.
We provide you the best and Comprehensive content which comes directly or indirectly in UPSC Exam.
Offline/Online Class