Daily News Analysis

Karnataka’s Domicile Quota in Jobs Bill

stylish_lining

Overview of the Bill

  • Bill Name: Karnataka State Employment of Local Candidates in the Industries, Factories, and Other Establishments Bill, 2024.
  • Key Provisions:
  • Local Candidate Definition: Individuals born in Karnataka or residing in the state for at least 15 years and proficient in Kannada.
  • Quota Requirements:
  • Management Categories: 50% of positions must be filled by local candidates.
  • Non-Management Categories: 70% of positions must be filled by local candidates.
  • Current Status: The bill has been approved but is currently on hold.

Context and Background

  • Similar Attempts: Haryana and Andhra Pradesh have attempted similar local reservation policies, but their implementations have faced legal and political challenges.

Constitutional and Legal Framework

1. Constitutionality of Domicile-Based Reservation

  • Equality of Opportunity:
  • Article 16(1): Guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment.
  • Article 16(2): Prohibits discrimination in public employment based on religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, or residence.
  • Affirmative Action:
  • Reservation for Backward Classes: States can reserve posts for backward classes inadequately represented in services (Article 16(4)).
  • Residence Requirement: States can set residence requirements for public employment but must adhere to constitutional principles (Article 16(3)).

2. Balancing Equality and Affirmative Action

  • Constitutional Balance:
  • Non-Discrimination: Ensures equal treatment among equals.
  • Affirmative Action: Allows reservations to address historical inequalities and promote representation for SCs/STs/OBCs, and economically weaker sections (EWS) as seen in the 103rd Constitutional Amendment.

3. Legal Basis for Local Reservation Laws

  • Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act: Abolishes residence requirements for employment except in Andhra Pradesh, Manipur, Tripura, and Himachal Pradesh.
  • Article 371(d): Provides Andhra Pradesh with special powers for local recruitment.
  • Article 371: Grants special provisions to certain states, allowing flexibility in recruitment rules.

4. Regional Language Criteria as a Workaround

  • Regional Language Requirements: Some states require knowledge of local languages as a criterion for employment, using Article 16(2) to support local job preferences. For instance:
  • Maharashtra, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu: Prescribe local language knowledge for state jobs.

5. Specific State Examples

  • Uttarakhand: Reserves Class III and IV jobs for locals.
  • Maharashtra, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu: Utilize regional language criteria to promote local employment.

Why Domicile-Based Reservation Should Not Be Implemented

Domicile-based reservation policies, such as those proposed in Karnataka's bill, face significant legal, constitutional, and practical challenges. Here’s why such policies are controversial and potentially problematic:

1. Balancing Equality with Affirmative Action

  • Constitutional Guarantees: The Indian Constitution ensures equality before the law (Article 14) and prohibits discrimination based on place of birth or residence (Article 16). While affirmative action is allowed to uplift backward classes (Articles 15 and 16), domicile-based reservations could violate these principles by favoring certain groups over others without adequate justification.
  • Legal Scrutiny: Any domicile-based reservation must carefully balance these provisions to avoid judicial invalidation. Courts often scrutinize such policies for their adherence to the principle of equality.

2. Violates Fundamental Right of Equality

  • Discrimination: Domicile-based reservations can lead to excessive discrimination against non-domicile candidates, thus violating their right to equality. This could foster regional divisions and social disharmony.
  • Social Unrest: Favoring locals over non-locals might incite tensions between different regional communities, disrupting social harmony and cooperation.

3. Economic Impact

  • Limited Job Opportunities: Such reservations can restrict job opportunities for skilled migrants, impacting economic growth and productivity. Companies may face challenges in hiring qualified individuals if forced to prioritize local candidates.
  • Reduced Diversity: Diversity in educational institutions and workplaces fosters innovation and growth. Domicile-based reservations might diminish this diversity, affecting the overall quality of talent and creativity.

4. Judicial Review

  • Scrutiny: State policies on domicile-based reservations are subject to judicial review. Courts assess if such policies are reasonable, proportionate, and align with the Constitution’s basic structure.
  • Reasonableness: The policies must demonstrate that they are reasonable and serve a legitimate state interest without violating fundamental rights.

5. 50% Upper Limit on Quota

  • Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) established that total reservations should not exceed 50% of available seats or posts. Domicile reservations must fit within this limit, alongside other reservation categories.
  • Reservation Cap: This cap includes all forms of reservation, meaning that domicile-based reservations must be balanced with existing quotas to avoid exceeding the legal limit.

6. Proving Inadequate Representation

  • Empirical Evidence: States must demonstrate inadequate representation of domiciled candidates to justify such reservations. Proving this can be complex and involve substantial administrative efforts.
  • Administrative Burden: Managing and verifying domicile status adds administrative burdens, potentially leading to inefficiencies and corruption.

Judicial Opinions on Domicile-Based Reservations

  • DP Joshi vs. The State Of Madhya Bharat (1955):
  • The Supreme Court quashed a fee exemption rule for Madhya Bharat students but did not address the broader issue of regional domicile as distinct from Indian domicile.
  • Andhra Pradesh Domicile Quota for Jobs (1970s):
  • The Supreme Court struck down this quota, stating that it was unconstitutional.
  • Sunanda Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1995):
  • The Court invalidated 100% domicile reservation in postgraduate medical courses, emphasizing that reservations should not compromise merit and efficiency.
  • Arvind Dattatraya Dhande v. Maharashtra Government (1997):
  • The Bombay High Court ruled against absolute domicile requirements for government jobs in Maharashtra, stating such measures are unconstitutional unless they adhere to reasonable classification principles.
  • Andhra Pradesh Employment of Local Candidates Bill (2019):
  • The AP High Court questioned the constitutionality of this bill, which mandated up to 75% reservation in certain jobs. The case remains under review.
  • Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act (2020):
  • The Punjab and Haryana High Court deemed this law unconstitutional and a violation of fundamental rights. The state’s appeal is pending before the Supreme Court.

Conclusion

Domicile-based reservations, while aimed at addressing local employment concerns, face significant constitutional and practical challenges. They must align with constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination, avoid exacerbating regional tensions, and adhere to judicial precedents and limits on reservation quotas. Implementing such policies requires careful consideration of their legal and social implications.

Maharashtra Scraps Hindi as Compulsory Third Language

The Maharashtra government recently scrapped its Government Resolutions (GRs) that mandated Hindi as a compulsory third language from Grades 1 to 5 in Marathi and English medium schools. While the
Share It

River Pollution in India

The Delhi government's focus on cleaning up the Yamuna River is part of a larger national effort to rejuvenate the Ganga River and its tributaries, in alignment with the Namami Gange Programme
Share It

Infrastructure Failures

The recent collapse of the Mahisagar River Bridge in Vadodara, which tragically claimed the lives of 20 people, underscores the growing concern over India's infrastructure quality. Similar
Share It

Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

The Supreme Court (SC) is currently reviewing the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) process for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, suggesting that Aadhaar,
Share It

GM Crop

In ongoing trade talks, the United States is advocating for India to open its agriculture market to genetically modified (GM) crops. However, India has firmly rejected this proposal, citing concer
Share It

India-Brazil Relations

India and Brazil share a growing and dynamic bilateral relationship that has evolved across various sectors since the establishment of diplomatic ties in 1948. Their Strategic Partnership, formali
Share It

Legislative Productivity

The Lok Sabha Speaker’s remarks about the need to enhance legislative productivity reflect growing concerns about the diminishing effectiveness of India’s legislative bodies. The chall
Share It

Economic Growth

India's rapid urbanization is set to dramatically shape its future. The transformation of its cities holds immense potential for economic growth, but it also brings significant challenges. As
Share It

Global South

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Brazil from July 2-9, 2025, for the BRICS summit, was not only his longest international visit in 11 years but also marked a significant diplomatic outr
Share It

Maharashtra’s Special Public Security Bill, 2024

The Maharashtra Assembly has recently passed the Special Public Security Bill, 2024, aimed at combating “urban Maoism” and left-wing extremism in the state. The Bill criminalizes activ
Share It

Newsletter Subscription


ACQ IAS
ACQ IAS