Daily News Analysis

Retribution for the south, accolade for the north

stylish_lining

Retribution for the south, accolade for the north

 

 

Why in the News?

The South Indian states face the risk of reduced political representation due to its lower population size compared to the northern states, amid the recent passing of Women Reservation bill, 2023 in the Parliament.

Delimitation and political representation:

  1. Article 81 of the Constitution: The Lok Sabha constituencies in the country should be equal by the size of population.
    1. 42nd Amendment Act 1976: The no. of Lok Sabha constituencies for States was determined based on 1971 census and frozen for the next 25 years.
    2. 84th Amendment Act: the freeze on no. of constituencies for each State was further prolonged until the first Census after 2026.
  2. The population growth rates difference between the northern and southern states:
    1. The proportion of the population of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh increased from 44% to 48.2%, between 1971 and 2011.
    2. During the same period, the proportion of population of the five southern States declined from 24.9% to 21.1%.
  3. If the size of Lok Sabha constituencies be enforced based on population projections of 2023, the five southern States will lose 23 seats, while the northern States will gain 37.
  4. The freeze on distribution of seats among States has to be continued.
    1. Southern states have achieved population control due to combined efforts of social changes brought in by the leaders along with implementation of family planning programmes.
    2. reducing the proportional representation of southern States shall be not only a disincentive for these States but also an incentive for others for inaction towards population control and social change as public policy.

Role of population in fiscal transfers:

  1. The Finance Commission constituted to recommend horizontal distribution of the Union government’s tax revenue among the States, provides larger weightage for Population and per capita income of a State.
  2. Population of a State is a measure of demand for public expenditure.
    1. The Eighth Finance Commission (1984-89), stipulated to use only the 1971 population in the distribution instead of the 1981 population, which continued till the Thirteenth Finance Commission (2010-15).
    2. The Fourteenth Finance Commission considered 1971 population, along with demographic changes since 1971, which immensely rewarded the southern States for controlling the population.
    3. However, the use of 2011 population in the distribution formula of the Fifteenth Finance Commission led to loss of advantage of gaining financial rewards for population control by the southern States.
  3. The per capita income of a State is as the ability to raise its own revenue. 
    1. A higher per capita income (PCI) of a State shall lead to lower share in the Union tax revenue.
    2. Lower PCI of a State may be due to higher population for a given Gross State Domestic Product, which suggests that higher the current population of a State, the higher its share in the Union tax revenue. 
    3. The combined share of the 5 southern States in the Union government’s tax revenue declined from 21.1% to 15.8%. while the combined share of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh increased from 51.5% to 53.2% from 2000-05 to 2021-26.

Critical Minerals

India’s first auction of deep-sea blocks for the extraction of critical minerals has been delayed indefinitely after receiving a poor response from bidders. This auction was expected to be a
Share It

CAG Report on States’ Fiscal Health

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has released its first decadal analysis on the fiscal health of 28 Indian states, revealing significant concerns over the increasing public debt.
Share It

President's Rule

The extension of President’s Rule in Manipur has brought to the fore the historical and controversial use of Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, shedding light on how its imposition disr
Share It

Beggars' Homes in India

In M.S. Patter v. State of NCT of Delhi, the Supreme Court (SC) held that state-run beggars’ homes are not merely penal institutions or charitable endeavors but are instead constitutional tr
Share It

Public Distribution System (PDS)

India's Public Distribution System (PDS) has long been a cornerstone of food security, ensuring access to subsidised cereals for millions of people. However, a recent Crisil study using the &l
Share It

Saudi-Pakistan Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA)

The recent Saudi-Pakistan Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA) represents a major shift in the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East and South Asia, with significant implications for Indi
Share It

Wassenaar Arrangement

The Wassenaar Arrangement is facing significant challenges in adapting its controls to the rapid growth of cloud technology. This issue highlights the need to update its control lists and enforcem
Share It

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)

The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) report for 2023 highlights a 9.2% increase in crimes against children in India, with 177,335 cases registered in total. This reflects a concerning rise in
Share It

Doctrine of Contributory Negligence

The Andhra Pradesh High Court recently made an important ruling regarding the doctrine of contributory negligence in criminal law. The court clarified that contributory negligence does not apply t
Share It

Perpetual Bonds

The Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd (IREDA) recently raised ₹453 crore at an interest rate of 7.70% per annum through its second issue of Perpetual Bonds. This move is part of the
Share It

Newsletter Subscription


ACQ IAS
ACQ IAS