Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) have gained prominence for their vital role in promoting collective action, protecting rights, and filling gaps in governance. They serve as catalysts for community mobilization, ensure citizen participation, and strengthen the foundations of democracy in India, functioning beyond both the state and markets.
A Civil Society Organization (CSO) refers to non-governmental, non-profit entities that unite people voluntarily to work collectively toward shared social, cultural, or ethical goals. These organizations function independently from the state and markets, often advocating for human rights, social justice, and community welfare.
Ancient–Medieval Roots:
The concept of civil society in India has ancient roots in dharma (duty), daan (giving), and karma (action), which fostered service through religious and social movements.
Pre-Independence Era:
Reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy (Brahmo Samaj), and Swami Vivekananda (Ramakrishna Mission) were key in linking voluntary action with social reform. They challenged social evils like caste discrimination and untouchability.
Gandhi’s Philosophy:
Mahatma Gandhi's advocacy for self-reliance, poverty alleviation, and constructive work spurred mass participation and voluntary service, laying the groundwork for modern CSOs.
Post-Independence:
The Indian state acknowledged the supporting role of voluntary organizations as development partners. Initiatives like Panchayati Raj and international NGOs during droughts (1965–67) reshaped the civil society landscape.
Contemporary Era:
Civil society expanded its focus beyond welfare to rights-based movements like Chipko (1973) and Narmada Bachao (1985), advocating for the right to food, work, education, and health.
With around 3.3 million NGOs today, civil society continues to grow, addressing issues like gender, caste, environment, and marginalization.
Societies Registration Act (1860): For literary, scientific, and charitable purposes.
Indian Trusts Act (1882): Governs trusts; state-specific acts like Bombay Public Trusts Act exist.
Companies Act (2013), Section 8: For non-profit activities in education, welfare, environment, etc.
Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA, 2010): Regulates foreign donations to CSOs.
Ensuring Accountability:
CSOs act as watchdogs, holding the state accountable by monitoring elections, scrutinizing state actions, and advocating for transparency. The Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan played a key role in the passage of the RTI Act (2005).
Empowering Citizens:
CSOs educate citizens on their rights, laws, and governance, fostering an informed and active citizenry. They encourage tolerance, respect for dissent, and democratic norms.
Women Empowerment:
Organizations like Jagori, Swayam, and SEWA have worked tirelessly to empower women, raise awareness about gender rights, and increase political participation in governance.
Programs such as the Institute of Social Sciences’ "Women’s Political Empowerment Program" have trained over 15,000 women for leadership roles in Panchayati Raj Institutions.
Leadership Development:
CSOs foster the development of political leaders by aggregating diverse societal interests. They act as shock-absorbers, helping to maintain social cohesion in conflict-prone areas and countering rigid political polarization.
Public Service Delivery & Supporting Reforms:
CSOs are instrumental in delivering essential services like healthcare, education, and disaster relief. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Goonj launched the ‘Rahat’ initiative to provide relief to vulnerable communities.
Global Governance:
CSOs contribute to shaping global governance by influencing international norms on issues like human rights, women’s rights, and environmental concerns, which then impact domestic policy.
Undermining Democratic Values:
Some CSOs pursue private interests, and can even promote racism, nationalism, or fundamentalism, undermining the democratic values they are supposed to uphold.
Funding Constraints:
Limited foreign funding (due to FCRA amendments in 2020) and insufficient domestic philanthropy make it difficult for many CSOs to sustain operations. State funding also carries the risk of corruption, diverting focus from democratic goals to short-term gains.
Inadequate Government Response:
Government agencies may be ill-equipped to handle CSO inputs, leading to friction and ineffective policymaking.
Inadequate Representation:
Marginalized groups (e.g., tribals, disabled persons, and women) often have limited access to CSOs, which can perpetuate structural inequalities.
Cultural Insensitivity:
Some global civil society efforts may overlook local cultural contexts, especially in the Global South, leading to interventions that are irrelevant or ineffective.
Internal Undemocracy:
Many CSOs suffer from a lack of internal democracy, including issues of transparency and inclusive decision-making, which contradict their democratic ideals.
External Manipulation:
CSOs may become influenced or manipulated by foreign powers to promote their own political or economic agendas, distorting their role in supporting democracy.
Volunteer Retention:
High turnover rates and inconsistent volunteer engagement make it difficult for CSOs to sustain long-term projects and community relationships.
Enhance Transparency and Accountability:
Establish a national CSO database for financial reports, impact assessments, and program outcomes. Voluntary third-party audits can further improve credibility.
Support Evidence-Based Policymaking:
CSOs should have representation on government committees and consultation forums, ensuring their data and insights are incorporated into policymaking.
Diversify Funding Sources:
Encourage domestic philanthropy, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) partnerships, and social impact investments to reduce reliance on foreign funding.
Simplify Regulatory Framework:
Streamline FCRA and CSO registration processes with a single-window digital system for ease of compliance.
Boost Volunteerism:
Launch national campaigns to promote volunteering and integrate community service into education. Maintain a volunteer database and use digital platforms to connect volunteers with CSOs.
Civil society is integral to the functioning of a participatory democracy, bridging the gap between the state and citizens. Strengthening CSOs is not only about governance but empowering society to shape its own future. A vibrant, transparent, and accountable civil society is the true measure of a resilient democracy. CSOs drive essential reforms, empower marginalized communities, and act as a crucial check on state power, making their role indispensable in India’s democratic framework
The Supreme Court (SC) has recently weighed in on the issue of social media influencers making derogatory remarks, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between free speech and the dignity of vulnerable groups. The Court noted the growing trend of commercializing free speech on platforms and the potential harm it can cause, especially to marginalized communities.
Commercialisation & Accountability:
Social media influencers often monetize free speech, which can overlap with prohibited speech.
The SC cautioned that such speech should not target vulnerable groups such as disabled individuals, women, children, minorities, or senior citizens.
Humour vs. Dignity:
The Court acknowledged that humour is vital, but it cautioned against jokes or remarks that perpetuate stigma, discrimination, and undermine the constitutional mandate of inclusivity.
Clear Boundaries in the Digital Space:
The SC emphasized the need for clear delineation between free speech, commercial speech, and prohibited speech, as irresponsible online content erodes social harmony and community trust.
Regulatory Guidelines:
The Court directed the Union Government to frame regulatory guidelines in consultation with stakeholders like the National Broadcasters and Digital Association.
These guidelines should ensure proportionate consequences for violators, moving beyond "empty formalities".
Sensitisation & Responsibility:
The Court emphasized the importance of awareness and sensitisation on digital ethics, holding influencers accountable for any harm caused by their content.
Apology & Balance of Rights:
Influencers were directed to issue unconditional apologies via their platforms, reiterating that the Court's intention is not to curtail free speech but to balance liberty with dignity in a diverse society.
The regulation of social media in India is primarily governed by the Information Technology Act, 2000, and subsequent rules. These include provisions aimed at ensuring online safety, data privacy, and the removal of unlawful content.
Information Technology Act, 2000:
Section 79(1) provides safe harbour protection to intermediaries (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) from liability for third-party content, as long as they act as neutral platforms.
Section 69A of IT Act, 2000:
Allows the Government to block content that threatens sovereignty, security, or public order.
Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021:
Mandates social media platforms to ensure user safety, remove unlawful content, and promote awareness on issues such as privacy, copyright, and national security.
2023 Amendment:
This amendment requires platforms to remove content related to misleading government information. However, its enforcement has been stayed by the Supreme Court due to concerns about misuse.
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): The SC struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, declaring that criticism, satire, and dissent are protected under Article 19(1)(a) unless they fall within reasonable restrictions.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017): The SC recognized privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21, influencing subsequent data protection measures.
There are several pressing reasons to regulate social media in India:
Protection of Vulnerable Groups:
Social media platforms, when unregulated, allow derogatory content, cyberbullying, and exploitation, particularly of marginalized communities (e.g., women, children, elderly, minorities).
Curbing Misinformation & Hate Speech:
The spread of fake news, deepfakes, and hate speech can damage social harmony and national security. Regulation can address these threats by curbing the disinformation ecosystem.
Safeguarding Mental Health:
The addictive nature of social media (e.g., FOMO, endless scrolling) has led to increased cases of anxiety, depression, and addiction. Regulatory measures can promote digital well-being and responsible design.
Ensuring Accountability of Influencers:
With the rise of influencer marketing, there have been instances of misleading promotions and financial risks. Regulation can introduce transparency, disclosure norms, and consumer protection.
Data Privacy & Security:
Social media platforms collect vast amounts of user data. Regulation is needed to protect users from privacy violations, surveillance, and misuse for profit or political influence.
Balancing Free Speech with Responsibility:
While free speech is protected under Article 19(1)(a), it is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2), particularly regarding public order, morality, and security. Effective regulation can help strike this balance.
Volume & Anonymity:
The sheer volume of content and anonymity of users make it difficult to regulate online speech effectively. This creates an environment conducive to hate speech and misinformation.
Transparency & Accountability Gaps:
Social media platforms often lack transparency in their content moderation processes, and there's insufficient independent oversight, leading to concerns about opaque practices and arbitrary decision-making.
Defining Harmful Content:
Defining harmful content is subjective. Cultural, political, and social differences complicate the process of distinguishing between legitimate expression and prohibited speech.
Free Speech vs. Censorship:
Any effort to regulate social media risks being seen as censorship. Clear, objective, and proportionate criteria are necessary to avoid the curtailment of free speech.
Cross-Border Jurisdictional Issues:
A large portion of harmful content originates from outside India's jurisdiction, making it difficult to enforce domestic laws.
Political Neutrality Concerns:
Content moderation decisions often raise accusations of political bias, affecting the credibility and effectiveness of regulation.
Robust Legal-Policy Framework:
Update the IT Act, 2000 to create a Digital India Act, ensuring platform accountability, data protection, and free speech, with judicial oversight to avoid overreach.
Algorithmic Transparency & Accountability:
Mandate algorithm audits and encourage the use of AI-driven moderation tools to ensure neutrality and quick redressal.
Technological & Institutional Capacity:
Expand cyber forensic labs and enhance agency capacity to monitor online content while ensuring privacy standards are maintained.
Digital Literacy & Ethical Usage:
Launch nationwide campaigns to promote digital literacy, combat misinformation, and encourage responsible online behavior.
Global & Multi-Stakeholder Cooperation:
Strengthen international collaboration on cross-border regulation and involve civil society, academia, and industry in creating a future-ready digital ecosystem.
Effective regulation of social media is essential to balance the right to free speech with the dignity and rights of vulnerable groups. By developing a robust legal framework, ensuring algorithmic transparency, fostering digital literacy, and promoting ethical online behavior, we can ensure a safe, inclusive, and credible digital ecosystem that fosters both innovation and accountability
Recently, the Trump administration approved the sale of 3,350 Extended Range Attack Munitions (ERAM) missiles to Ukraine, marking a significant development in military support amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions.
The Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) is a next-generation, air-launched, precision-guided missile that combines the firepower of a heavy bomb with the extended range of a cruise missile. It has been developed to provide greater operational flexibility and strike capabilities at longer distances, especially in high-intensity conflict zones.
Range:
The ERAM missile has an impressive range, depending on its flight profile, capable of striking targets from a distance of 240 to 450 kilometers. This allows it to hit deep within enemy lines while keeping the launch platform at a safer distance.
Warhead:
Each ERAM missile is equipped with a 500-pound high-explosive warhead. The warhead is designed to destroy critical infrastructure such as hardened bunkers, fuel depots, and ammunition storage, making it an effective tool for neutralizing enemy strongholds.
Guidance System:
ERAM uses a combination of GPS, inertial navigation, and a terminal seeker to achieve precision. This provides high accuracy within a range of about 10 meters, ensuring that the missile can hit its target with minimal collateral damage.
Launch Platforms:
The ERAM missile is designed to be modular and compact, allowing it to be mounted on a wide range of Western fighter jets, such as the F-16s, which Ukraine is receiving. Additionally, the missile can potentially be retrofitted onto Soviet-era aircraft, making it versatile and adaptable to the existing military infrastructure of nations like Ukraine.
Production and Cost:
ERAM missiles are designed for volume production, meaning they are cheaper to manufacture compared to more traditional precision-guided munitions. This cost-effectiveness allows for greater quantities to be produced and deployed without significantly draining defense budgets.
Longer-Range Precision Strikes:
The ability to strike targets from 450 kilometers away significantly extends the reach of air forces, giving them the capacity to hit deep enemy targets without the need for close proximity. This is especially important in high-risk zones, where maintaining a safe distance is essential for the survival of the attacking aircraft.
Versatility in Launch Platforms:
The missile’s compatibility with both Western fighter jets like the F-16 and Soviet-era aircraft provides flexibility in its deployment. This is particularly beneficial for nations like Ukraine, which has an aging fleet of Soviet-designed aircraft but has received significant Western military aid.
Countering Hardened Targets:
The ERAM’s ability to destroy hardened bunkers, fuel depots, and ammunition storage makes it a crucial tool in modern warfare, especially against adversaries who have fortified positions or strategic reserves. This capability is critical in neutralizing key infrastructure that could otherwise sustain prolonged military engagements.
Volume Production and Affordability:
The relatively lower production cost of the ERAM missile, while maintaining high effectiveness, ensures that it can be procured in large quantities. This makes it a cost-effective addition to the arsenal of nations looking to bolster their precision strike capabilities without significant financial strain.
Enhancing NATO-Ukraine Military Cooperation:
The approval of the ERAM missile sale to Ukraine is part of broader efforts to strengthen NATO-Ukraine military cooperation, especially as tensions with Russia continue. The missile’s capabilities align with the ongoing efforts to modernize Ukraine’s air force and provide them with a credible deterrence against adversaries.
U.S.-Ukraine Military Support:
The sale of ERAM missiles signifies continued U.S. support for Ukraine’s defense capabilities amid the ongoing conflict with Russia. This is part of a broader trend where the U.S. has been supplying advanced weaponry to Ukraine to counter Russian advances, thus influencing the strategic balance in the region.
Russia’s Response:
The approval of such advanced weapons systems will likely escalate tensions with Russia, which has long been wary of Western military aid to Ukraine. Russia may respond by enhancing its own military capabilities or taking additional countermeasures, further complicating the geopolitical situation.
Global Military Trends:
The development and deployment of ERAM missiles align with modern military trends toward longer-range, precision-guided strikes, which are increasingly becoming the norm in asymmetric warfare. This shift reflects the growing importance of air superiority, remote engagements, and the ability to incapacitate key targets without direct confrontation.
In conclusion, the approval of the sale of 3,350 ERAM missiles to Ukraine represents a critical development in both military strategy and geopolitical dynamics. The missile's extended range, versatility, and precision make it a valuable asset for Ukraine and highlight the increasing role of advanced air-launched munitions in contemporary warfare
Recent research from Caltech University has revealed new insights into the mechanisms of mitochondrial protein import, challenging the traditional understanding and offering a more complex view of how proteins are transported into mitochondria.
Mitochondria are double-membraned organelles known as the powerhouses of the cell, as they generate ATP (adenosine triphosphate), which is the primary energy source for cellular processes.
Origin: Mitochondria are believed to have originated more than a billion years ago through endosymbiosis, where a primitive archaeal cell and a bacterium merged.
Gene Transfer: Over time, mitochondria transferred most of their genetic material to the host cell’s nucleus, becoming highly dependent on the host cell for the proteins they need to function.
For many years, scientists believed that mitochondrial proteins were imported into the mitochondria only after they were fully synthesized in the cytosol by ribosomes. The general assumption was that proteins completed their synthesis on ribosomes before passing through mitochondrial membrane channels for import.
Caltech researchers have uncovered a surprising new mechanism in mitochondrial protein import that revises this long-standing understanding:
Cotranslational Import: Around 20% of mitochondrial proteins are cotranslationally imported, meaning they are transported into the mitochondria while still being synthesized by ribosomes in the cytosol.
This cotranslational import is particularly crucial for large, structurally complex proteins that need help in folding properly. If these proteins fully fold in the cytosol, they can form structures that are irreversibly misfolded, blocking the import channels into mitochondria.
The new findings describe how the import of these proteins into mitochondria works:
Mitochondrial Targeting Sequence: These proteins contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS), a signal that helps direct them to the mitochondria.
Second Signal Required: The MTS is not enough by itself. The process requires a second signal, which is the first large protein domain that emerges during the translation of the protein.
Role of the First Protein Domain: This first domain acts like a “code” or a “boarding pass” that helps guide the protein into the mitochondria early in its synthesis, before it has fully folded. This early import prevents the protein from folding inappropriately and ensures it enters the mitochondria correctly for further processing and folding.
Experiments confirmed that transplanting these specific domains onto other proteins that normally don’t undergo cotranslational import was sufficient to reroute these proteins for cotranslational import as well. This finding was crucial in demonstrating that this cotranslational import mechanism is both specific and adaptable.
This discovery has profound implications for understanding protein import mechanisms, particularly in relation to:
Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Many mitochondrial diseases arise from defects in protein import, so a better understanding of these processes could help in the development of therapies for mitochondrial disorders.
Cellular Protein Management: The discovery adds a new layer to the way we think about cellular protein management, showing that the process of protein import is more dynamic and complex than previously thought.
Potential Applications in Biotechnology: The new understanding could have applications in biotechnology, especially for protein engineering and drug design targeting mitochondrial functions.
The research from Caltech marks a significant advancement in the field of cell biology by revising our understanding of how mitochondrial proteins are imported into mitochondria. It underscores the complexity of cellular processes and opens new avenues for research into mitochondrial health, disease treatment, and biotechnological innovations
We provide offline, online and recorded lectures in the same amount.
Every aspirant is unique and the mentoring is customised according to the strengths and weaknesses of the aspirant.
In every Lecture. Director Sir will provide conceptual understanding with around 800 Mindmaps.
We provide you the best and Comprehensive content which comes directly or indirectly in UPSC Exam.
If you haven’t created your account yet, please Login HERE !
We provide offline, online and recorded lectures in the same amount.
Every aspirant is unique and the mentoring is customised according to the strengths and weaknesses of the aspirant.
In every Lecture. Director Sir will provide conceptual understanding with around 800 Mindmaps.
We provide you the best and Comprehensive content which comes directly or indirectly in UPSC Exam.
Offline/Online Class
