International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

The recent advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) addresses crucial aspects of climate change mitigation within the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Key Highlights of the ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Climate Change Mitigation

1. Recognition of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions as Marine Pollution:
   • Marine Pollution: The ITLOS confirmed that under Article 194(1) of UNCLOS, parties are obligated to prevent, reduce, and control marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions.
   • Pollutants: The tribunal clarified that carbon dioxide (CO2) released into the marine environment qualifies as a pollutant under Article 1(1)(4) of UNCLOS. This aligns with scientific findings on ocean acidification caused by CO2 emissions.
2. Impact on Climate Change Litigation:
   • Precedent: The advisory opinion sets a significant precedent for climate change litigation, particularly concerning obligations of states regarding climate change mitigation.
   • ICJ Proceedings: This opinion may influence upcoming advisory proceedings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the "Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change."
3. Legal Significance and Obligations:
   • Principle of Prevention: The opinion extends the principle of prevention, which traditionally aims to avoid transboundary harm, to the regulation of climate change. This principle emphasizes collective responsibility rather than bilateral obligations.
   • Due Diligence and Equity: The ITLOS described the obligation to mitigate GHG emissions as a due diligence obligation with stringent standards due to the severe and irreversible risks associated with GHG emissions. The principle of equity must be considered, recognizing the diverse capabilities and resources of different states.
   • General Obligations: The obligations outlined are general in nature, with states required to undertake measures to reduce GHG emissions over time. However, specific measures or methodologies for assessing the level of required action were not detailed.
4. Political and Legal Influence:
   • Political Weight: While advisory opinions are not legally binding, they hold significant political authority as authoritative judicial pronouncements. The opinion reinforces the need for substantial and concrete actions by states to address climate change, moving beyond symbolic commitments.

Background on ITLOS

1. Establishment and Purpose:
   • Creation: ITLOS was established under UNCLOS, which was adopted in 1982 and entered into force in 1994.
   • Purpose: The tribunal’s primary role is to resolve disputes arising from the interpretation and application of UNCLOS and to provide advisory opinions on legal questions related to the convention.
2. Structure and Jurisdiction:
   • Composition: ITLOS consists of 21 independent judges elected by states parties to UNCLOS, serving nine-year terms with the possibility of re-election.
   • Jurisdiction: The tribunal’s jurisdiction encompasses various maritime issues, including territorial disputes, maritime boundaries, fishing rights, environmental protection, and navigation.
3. Functions:
   • Dispute Resolution: ITLOS hears cases brought by states, international organizations, and other entities authorized by UNCLOS.
   • Advisory Opinions: The tribunal can provide advisory opinions on legal questions referred by the United Nations General Assembly, the Security Council, or other authorized international organizations.
4. Headquarters:
   • Location: The ITLOS is headquartered in Hamburg, Germany.

Conclusion

The ITLOS advisory opinion on climate change mitigation highlights the obligation of states under UNCLOS to address marine pollution caused by anthropogenic GHG emissions. By recognizing CO2 as a pollutant and extending the principle of prevention to climate change, the opinion sets a significant precedent for international climate litigation and emphasizes the need for substantial action. Although advisory opinions are not legally binding, they carry substantial political weight and influence. ITLOS’s role in interpreting and applying UNCLOS principles, combined with its recent advisory opinion, underscores the importance of integrating climate change mitigation into international maritime law and policy.