Daily News Analysis

Police Reforms in India

stylish_lining

At the 60th All India Conference of Director Generals/Inspector Generals of Police in Raipur, held under the theme ‘Viksit Bharat: Security Dimensions’, the Prime Minister emphasized the urgent need to improve public perception of the police by enhancing their professionalism, sensitivity, and responsiveness.

Need for Police Reforms in India

Police reforms are essential to create a force that is professional, accountable, and people-centric, capable of meeting the complex security and justice needs of a modern democracy. Reforms are necessary to address structural, political, operational, and trust-related challenges facing Indian policing.

1. Political and Structural Inertia

Structural Stagnation

Many states still operate under frameworks derived from the Police Act, 1861, a colonial-era law. This restricts flexibility and undermines the democratic policing model.

Non-Compliance with Court Directives

Despite Supreme Court directives in the Prakash Singh case (2006), no state has fully implemented the creation of independent police boards or fixed-tenure systems.

Political Pressure

Political influence over postings and transfers forces officers to prioritize political interests over the rule of law. According to the Status of Policing in India Report (SPIR) 2019, 72% of personnel reported political pressure in cases involving influential persons.

Weak Oversight

Inadequate complaint mechanisms render public grievance redressal ineffective. About 30% of functional State Police Complaints Authorities (SPCAs) lack a judicial member (IJR 2022).

2. Workforce and Capacity Crisis

Excessive Workload

Police personnel face excessive duty hours and inconsistent weekly rest, impairing performance. The average workday is 14 hours (SPIR 2019).

Promotion Stagnation

Limited promotion opportunities reduce motivation. Constables form 86% of the workforce, yet most retire with only one promotion after 30 years.

Training Deficit

Outdated training fails to prepare officers for modern forensics, cybercrime investigation, and human-rights compliance. 64% of personnel have received no in-service training in the last five years (IJR 2022).

3. Diversity and Trust Deficit

Gender Gap

Low female participation restricts gender-sensitive policing. Women constitute only 12% of the police force, far below the 33% target.

Minority Underrepresentation

Weak minority representation in higher ranks reduces perceived neutrality. Although Muslims form 14% of the population, they constitute only 3–4% of the police force.

Public Trust Deficit

Fear of police aggression discourages crime reporting and community cooperation. A CSDS Survey reports that 14% of citizens are highly fearful of the police.

4. Human Rights and Infrastructure Issues

Custodial Violence

The absence of an anti-torture law allows “third-degree” methods to continue unchecked. India signed the UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) in 1997 but has yet to ratify it.

Infrastructure Deficit

Many police stations lack basic amenities. In 2020, 257 stations had no vehicles, and 638 had no telephones, reducing operational efficiency and public access.

Modernisation Lag

Underutilisation of the Police Modernisation Fund (MPF) leaves forces under-equipped in weapons, vehicles, and technology. Approximately 30–40% of the fund remains unspent annually (IJR 2022).

5. Supreme Court Directives: Prakash Singh Case (2006)

Tenure Protection

  • Minimum two-year tenure for DGPs, IGs, SPs, and SHOs.

  • Temporary or acting DGP appointments prohibited.

Transfer Insulation

  • All postings, transfers, promotions, and service matters should be handled by Police Establishment Boards (PEBs).

Accountability Mechanisms

  • Establish State Police Complaints Authorities (SPCAs) for public grievance redressal.

  • Constitute State Security Commissions (SSC) to prevent political interference.

Functional Separation

  • Separate investigation from law-and-order duties.

  • Constitute a National Security Commission to oversee central police chiefs.

6. Consequences of Functional Overload

  • Poor Investigations: Overloaded officers lead to weak charge sheets; India’s IPC conviction rate is 57% (NCRB 2022).

  • Public Distrust: Slow response and inadequate patrolling reduce citizen confidence; 14% of citizens are highly fearful (CSDS Survey).

  • Officer Fatigue: Long workdays cause burnout, affecting professionalism and decision-making (SPIR).

  • Rights Violations: Pressure and fatigue increase custodial violence and harassment incidents (NHRC).

  • Community Neglect: VIP duties reduce engagement in core policing and women help desks, weakening preventive policing.

Key Committees, Commissions, and Judgments on Police Reforms

Committee / Commission / Judgment

Key Reforms Proposed

Gore Committee (1971)

Advocated professional, service-oriented policing; emphasized human rights and ethics in training.

National Police Commission (NPC) 1977–1981

Suggested separation of investigation from law & order, fixed tenures for senior officers, and drafting a new Model Police Act.

Ribeiro (1998) & Padmanabhaiah (2000)

Advocated independent oversight, modern training, and community policing.

Malimath Committee (2003)

Strengthen forensic & investigative capabilities, create central law enforcement agency, and propose witness protection.

Supreme Court (Prakash Singh, 2006)

Issued 7 directives: State Security Commission, fixed DGP tenure, separation of Investigation & L&O, Police Establishment Board, Police Complaints Authorities, and National Security Commission.

Model Police Act (2006) & NHRC Recommendations (2021)

Focused on autonomy, accountability, and regulation of surveillance.

Smart Policing Initiative (2015)

Leverage technology, AI, and predictive policing with focus on community engagement.

Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF) Scheme

Upgrade weaponry, communication, forensic labs, and cybercrime infrastructure.

Reforms Needed to Improve Policing Effectiveness

  1. Full Implementation of Court Directives

    • Enforce Supreme Court’s 7 directives (2006), including independent State Security Commissions with majority non-political members.

    • Establish Police Complaints Authorities (PCA) at state and district levels with statutory investigative powers.

  2. Strengthen Internal Accountability

    • Empower Police Establishment Boards for transfers/postings.

    • Introduce performance audits based on public satisfaction, crime prevention, and investigation quality rather than crime rates alone.

  3. Functional Specialization

    • Separate Investigation from Law & Order in all police stations.

    • Upgrade cybercrime units and forensic labs nationwide.

    • Implement a nationwide NATGRID to integrate security agencies’ databases for counter-terrorism.

  4. Institutionalize Community Policing

    • Establish structured police-public partnerships for intelligence, problem-solving, and trust-building.

    • Adopt a Police-as-Service model with Citizens’ Charters and social media-based grievance redressal.

  5. Address New-Age Challenges

    • Create specialized units for financial fraud, cyberterrorism, organized crime, and narcotics.

    • Ensure inter-agency data-sharing and joint operations among state police, central agencies, and intelligence bureaus.

Conclusion

Police reform in India requires moving beyond colonial structures. Full implementation of Supreme Court directives, functional autonomy, technological modernization, and community-oriented service are essential.


 


 

Police Reforms in India

At the 60th All India Conference of Director Generals/Inspector Generals of Police in Raipur, held under the theme ‘Viksit Bharat: Security Dimensions’, the Prime Minister emphasized t
Share It

Assam Accord

The Supreme Court has recently asked the Union Government to clarify whether a new executive order allowing the entry of persecuted minorities into India violates the 1971 cut-off date prescribed
Share It

Supreme Court Directions on Digital Arrest Scams

A Bench of the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, issued a landmark directive aimed at strengthening India’s response to cybercrime. Grant of Pan-In
Share It

World AIDS Day 2025

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare observed World AIDS Day 2025 under the theme: “Overcoming disruption, transforming the AIDS response.” The event highlighted India’s p
Share It

Kerala Landslides

The Union Government recently sanctioned only ₹260 crore in disaster relief to Kerala following the Wayanad landslides of July 2024, despite the State’s estimated losses of ₹2,200 crore.
Share It

National Judicial Policy

The Chief Justice of India, Justice Surya Kant, has called for the formulation of a National Judicial Policy to reduce divergence in judicial functioning across courts. He also stated that the Sup
Share It

India’s Bioeconomy

India aims to achieve a $1.2 trillion bioeconomy by 2047, which will require capital-market innovation, regulatory modernization, and a strategic blend of technological and scientific innovation.
Share It

Vanashakti Case

The Vanashakti case was filed by the environmental NGO Vanashakti, challenging the legality of retrospective (post-facto) environmental clearances (ECs) granted to industrial and construction proj
Share It

Exercise EKUVERIN

The 14th edition of Exercise EKUVERIN is scheduled to take place in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. About Exercise EKUVERIN The word “Ekuverin” means ‘Friends’ in the Dhi
Share It

Judicial Backlog in India

India’s judicial system is facing a serious backlog of cases, with over 4.8 crore cases pending across various courts. Many cases have been pending for decades, highlighting the urgent need
Share It

Newsletter Subscription


ACQ IAS
ACQ IAS