Daily News Analysis

Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA)

stylish_lining

The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, officially known as the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, was enacted with the aim of recognizing and vesting forest rights to communities historically dependent on forests. These communities, especially Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers, faced long-standing marginalization and denial of their rights over forest resources.

Objectives of the Act

The FRA seeks to:

  • Correct historical injustices faced by forest-dwelling communities.

  • Secure livelihoods, habitat, and food security through legal recognition of traditional forest rights.

Key Provisions of the Act

  1. Recognition of Forest Rights:

    • Individual Rights: These include rights to self-cultivation, habitation, and rehabilitation for those displaced from forests.

    • Community Rights: These cover grazing livestock, fishing, access to water bodies, rights over minor forest produce (MFP), and traditional knowledge. Communities can also play a role in forest conservation and maintaining traditional practices.

  2. Eligibility Criteria:

    • Any individual or community residing in and depending on forests for at least three generations (75 years) before 13th December 2005 is eligible to claim rights under the Act.

  3. Critical Wildlife Habitats (CWHs):

    • The Act ensures inviolability of wildlife habitats within National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Relocation from these areas can only happen with free, prior, and informed consent and proper rehabilitation of forest-dwelling communities.

  4. Institutional Mechanism for Granting Forest Rights:

    • Gram Sabha (village council) is the primary authority for determining individual and community forest rights.

    • The Sub-Divisional Level Committee (SDLC) examines the claims and forwards them for verification.

    • District Level Committee (DLC) provides final approval for the recognition of rights.

Key Findings from the UNDP Report on FRA Implementation

The UNDP Report titled "Securing Rights, Enabling Futures" reviewed nearly 20 years of the FRA’s implementation and highlighted the following:

  1. Persistent Gaps in Implementation:

    • Uneven implementation due to historical conflicts, weak policy execution, and jurisdictional overlaps.

    • Missing land titles, especially in Chhattisgarh, indicating poor record-keeping.

  2. Sunset Clause Debate:

    • Some states (e.g., Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Maharashtra) have proposed an end date for recognizing forest rights, but the report suggests Gram Sabhas should decide when the process reaches saturation instead of setting arbitrary deadlines.

  3. Incorrect Recognition of Titles:

    • Problems like inaccurate mapping, insufficient verification, and weak coordination between departments have led to incorrect title recognition.

  4. Institutional Challenges:

    • Ongoing conflicts between the Tribal Welfare and Forest Departments, causing delays in the process.

    • Unclear integration of Gram Sabha Forest Management Plans with official Forest Working Plans.

  5. Record-Keeping Issues:

    • The absence of a centralized, updated database of FRA titleholders, making monitoring and verification difficult.

Key Recommendations from the UNDP Report

To address the gaps and improve the implementation of the Forest Rights Act, the UNDP report made the following recommendations:

  1. Strengthen Governance After Recognition:

    • Set up inter-departmental committees to resolve conflicts and improve coordination between tribal, forest, and revenue authorities.

  2. Improve Record-Keeping:

    • Establish accurate, digitized, and centralized records of FRA titleholders at both the state and national levels.

  3. Promote Gender Equity:

    • Ensure women’s leadership in Community Forest Resource (CFR) management plans and collect gender-disaggregated data.

    • Link FRA with the National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM) to create gender-sensitive livelihood options for forest dwellers.

  4. Mainstream Forest Rights:

    • Include FRA beneficiaries in all government welfare and livelihood schemes.

    • Formulate a National Tribal Policy for a 5-year period to coordinate tribal welfare and forest governance.

  5. Sustaining Progress:

    • Mission-mode schemes like PM JANMAN and DAJGUA have shown progress, but long-term, sustainable programs are needed for inclusive growth.

  6. Unused Provisions:

    • Section 3(1)(k) of the FRA, which provides community rights over biodiversity, intellectual property, and traditional knowledge, remains largely unutilized. The report suggests tapping this provision for community-led income generation.

  7. Minor Forest Produce (MFP):

    • The report stresses the need for clarification on the ownership, harvesting, transport, and sale of MFP, ensuring that forest dwellers receive a fair share of income from forest-based resources.

Conclusion

The Forest Rights Act, 2006 is a landmark law aimed at securing the rights of forest-dwelling communities in India. While the implementation has faced several challenges, the UNDP's recommendations underscore the importance of better governance, improved record-keeping, gender equity, and the inclusion of FRA beneficiaries in broader welfare schemes to ensure long-term success and inclusive development for these communities.


 


 

23rd India–Russia Annual Summit

1. Strengthening of the Strategic Partnership India and Russia reaffirmed their Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the 2000 Strategic Partne
Share It

Biological Weapons Convention (BWC)

At the 50-year commemoration of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) held in New Delhi, India’s External Affairs Minister highlighted that the world remains ill-prepared to deal with biot
Share It

Judicial Pendency

The Union Minister of Law and Justice has highlighted a serious manpower crisis in the Indian judiciary, where high judicial vacancies combined with a rising case load—nearly 4.80 crore pend
Share It

India’s Electoral Integrity

India’s electoral integrity is increasingly under strain, not because of an absence of reforms, but due to the introduction of potentially deformative measures such as Delimitation, One Nati
Share It

Bioremediation in India

India is increasingly revisiting bioremediation as pollution from sewage, industrial waste, pesticides, plastics, and oil spills continues to degrade the country’s soil, water, and air. Conv
Share It

Police Reforms in India

At the 60th All India Conference of Director Generals/Inspector Generals of Police in Raipur, held under the theme ‘Viksit Bharat: Security Dimensions’, the Prime Minister emphasized t
Share It

Assam Accord

The Supreme Court has recently asked the Union Government to clarify whether a new executive order allowing the entry of persecuted minorities into India violates the 1971 cut-off date prescribed
Share It

Supreme Court Directions on Digital Arrest Scams

A Bench of the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, issued a landmark directive aimed at strengthening India’s response to cybercrime. Grant of Pan-In
Share It

World AIDS Day 2025

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare observed World AIDS Day 2025 under the theme: “Overcoming disruption, transforming the AIDS response.” The event highlighted India’s p
Share It

Kerala Landslides

The Union Government recently sanctioned only ₹260 crore in disaster relief to Kerala following the Wayanad landslides of July 2024, despite the State’s estimated losses of ₹2,200 crore.
Share It

Newsletter Subscription


ACQ IAS
ACQ IAS